Sherie Griffiths

February 24, 2011

When Is An Hour Forty-eight Minutes Long?

The answer is: when it’s on British commercial TV.
UK independent television is to be allowed to make increase the length of ad breaks from seven to twelve minutes. It’s an experiment which will run for a year.

The main aim is to bring more revenue into the TV companies, which have been hit by the economic climate like almost every other advertising medium (with the exception of certain online options).

I have to be honest and say I was sure that some of the smaller, digital-only channels, already ran way more than twelve minutes of ads per hour. It sometimes feels as though there are more ads than programme – but maybe that’s just me.

The TV companies and the advertisers are, of course, up against one major challenge here: the remote control. So many of us have the ability to stop and start shows, fast-forward through them etc, they’ll really have to work to get our attention. That’s one reason TV advertising revenues started falling in the first place.

One good thing I can see happening – I think it has to in fact – is that advertisers will put more effort into making ads entertaining and engaging. It can be done – the cult of the mear cat is testament to that. Love him or loath him, Alexander is a phenomenon in his own right now. The only danger with creating something like that is that some people (I’ve met a few) get so caught up in the character, they actually forget what he’s advertising.

If it’s done cleverly, the extended break will work – but ad agencies etc are really going to have to stay on their toes – which could be fun to watch.

Whatever our medium, whoever our audience might be and whether we’re selling a product, information or any other message, we have to be ready to entertain before we sell.

What do you think about longer ad breaks? Are you interested to see what use is made of them? Or are they just a longer opportunity to get a drink, go to the loo or see what’s on the other side?

March 8, 2010

The Advertising Industry Is Apparently Getting ‘Less Worse’

This story was carried on Friday morning’s BBC business news, although actually, the quote and the figures which prompted it have been around for a while.  It comes from Sir Martin Sorrell, CEO of global advertising agency WPP, which is the parent company of a number of other ad agencies.  The company’s profits are rising again, after the ‘most worst’ (my words) advertising recession ever seen.  Interestingly, within WPP, online marketing seems to have put in the ‘least weakest’ (again, my words) performance.

Earlier in the week, we had the latest figures from ITV, showing a 2.7 billion pound loss in 2008 converted into a profit of 25 million in 2009 – significantly less worse!  Traditional advertising revenues were on the slide before the recession bit and the improvement (or should that be ‘negative deterioration’?) is due at least in part to changes in the kind of advertising offered – specifically, the increase in ‘spot’ ads – directly attached to programmes.  These are supposed to catch the viewer who has drifted away during the ad break – or whizzed through the ads while watching via Sky+ or similar.  Then there are whole segments of viewing sponsored by one advertiser – so their ad pops up at the beginning and end of every part of every show in that segment. 

It’s quite comforting, in a way, isn’t it, to know that even a massive global industry like advertising has to move with the times, to adapt to changing technologies by coming up with innovative ways of reaching their target market?

As for the negative dressed as a positive – or is it the other way around? – I find that less comforting.  In fact, I find it quite disconcerting.  As we climb out of recession, whatever industry we’re in, if we’re scared to look forward with confidence – and to admit that’s what we’re doing – aren’t we in danger of missing the next opportunity?  Any thoughts?

Hosted by Killer SEO SuperBlogs