Sherie Griffiths

October 7, 2011

October 5, 2011

Sound connections

I meet a lot of people on my travels who are really afraid of anyone who looks remotely like a competitor. I’m not knocking anybody who networks via groups which only allow one member per business sector. I know they work extremely well for thousands of businesses – and anything that gets the phone ringing can’t be sniffed at!

I have to say, though, they don’t work for me. Well, they might, in terms of bringing in new business – but I don’t enjoy them. I much prefer what I think of as ‘natural’ networking – walking into a room, whether it’s a networking event or not, and not having the first clue who I’m going to meet. Yes, in theory in that situation you could run across someone who does exactly the same job as you – but it’s highly unlikely. Even two people doing apparently the same job in the same industry will have different approaches, slightly different focuses – and so often, there’s scope for very productive collaboration.

I first ran across Richard Heathcote through a more open networking group. On the face of it, our activities could have looked very similar. We both work in sound; we both produce podcasts, for ourselves and others – but to be honest, that’s about it.

Whilst my focus, where audio is concerned, is on helping businesses to create professional-sounding, compelling content for download or cd distribution, Richard is primarily a voiceover artist. So while I attempt to teach businesspeople to present their own messages, Richard can speak for them.

He’s more than a mouth for hire, though. Some voiceover artistss need the backup of a professional studio to produce anything; but Richard has the technical skills and setup to allow him to be self-sufficient.

Not so long ago, he opened an online ‘audio shop’, providing a range of ‘off-the-shelf’ audio which people can download to use on their phone systems etc – perfect if you hate recording your own voicemail greeting and the like.  

 

He’s just helped me out with a little editing issue I was having – and he’ll be heard on at least one of my upcoming online courses. If either of us had taken a more restrictive approach to networking and the whole competition issue, we would probably have avoided each other like the plague – and missed out on the potential for some interesting and exciting collaborations.

Speaking of ‘interesting and exciting collaborations’: I have the challenge of interviewing my long-standing colleague and friend, Paul Smalley of Paper Mountain Solutions, on tomorrow’s radio show. Paul is heavily involved in the launch of a brand new business, designed to help brand new businesses. I can’t say any more until tomorrow. You can catch the show at 3PM, on 97.8 FM in the Basildon & East Thurrock area, or at gateway978.com.

If you don’t manage to listen, I’ll tell you more on Friday.

August 10, 2011

The Only Way is Bikinis – yes, really!

After a great show last week, talking natural nails, spray tans and inspiration with Loretta Fletcher of Bella Voi, I’m finishing off the preparation for another episode of ‘The Only Way is Enterprise’. This time, it’s all about what some of us (who are brave enough!) might wear to show off the results of a visit to Loretta.

Tomorrow’s show is with Karen Wilton of The Only Way is Bikinis. Karen, who by day organises conferences and other events for the University of East London’s Centre for Excellence for Women in Enterprise (CEWE), works into the wee small hours, with her daughter, creating or customizing bikinis to out-glitz and out-glam anything the girls on ‘The Only Way is Essex’ have been seen in!

I said ‘creating or customizing’ because not only do the ladies make amazing thongs – sorry – I meant amazing things! – from scratch, they also take a customer’s own bikini and give it a make-over – and their ‘flowers don’t flop!’

If you want to know why that’s so important – and why I think it should be their marketing strapline – listen at 3PM tomorrow, on 97.8 FM if you’re in the Basildon and East Thurrock area, or online if you’re not.

If you know a business which has benefitted from the TV show ‘The Only Way is Essex’, let me know. This is looking to be a fun series of interviews and I’d love to do more.

July 25, 2011

The entrepreneur’s kitbag – the No. 1 must-have is a must-have

Last week, I overheard a snippet of a discussion on Radio 2, about whether anyone can become a successful entrepreneur, or whether you need special qualities. That prompted me to look around at the most commercially successful people I know. They’re all at different stages in their businesses, in completely different industries, and on the face of it, they’re very different people – but they have at least ten things in common. I can’t put NOs 10 to 2 into a definitive order, but they are:

10 – a healthy disregard for time – none of them watches the clock when there’s work to be finished;

9 – The unshakeable belief that they deserve to succeed in their aims and therefore they can – and they will – actually, no, it’s beyond that -‘belief’ implies an element of faith in something it might not be possible to prove; but what they have is knowledge – they know they deserve to get where they want to go;

8 – Equal certainty that what their business does is of real value to its customers;

7 – Ridiculous amounts of energy, including the kind of stamina a distance athlete would envy;

6 – Blinkers – which are capable of filtering out everything except the business,

5 – Less subtlety than the average brick – somehow combined with the ability to inspire forgiveness from family, friends, colleagues etc, for behaviour which, from anyone else would, quite frankly, be unacceptable!;

4 – A powerful set of ‘bum springs’, or ‘weeble weights’ (my terminology) – so that when life knocks them over, they just bounce straight back up again!;

3 – More front than Southend and Blackpool put together and

2 – what I recently heard described as: ‘a constitutional aversion to spending money’.

So what’s No. 1?

Every business adviser you’ll ever meet will tell you you need to set goals. That’s fine – except that goal posts are notoriously easy to move – especially when the goal is a ‘nice to have’. I made that mistake when I got started – and I kept making it for several years! I’d think: ‘I want to earn x, so that I can do Y’. Y was always a nice to have – like a weekend away – very pleasant if I achieved it, but hardly the end of the world if I didn’t. What the people I’ve been talking about all have – and what I have now – is at least one imperative – a ‘must have’, or a ‘must to avoid’. These days, I’ve got one of each – a carrot and a stick. If I start to lose sight of the carrot, the stick catches me across the ankles. I can honestly say I’ve never been so focused in my life!

Now all I have to do is perfect the other 9…!!!

July 22, 2011

Feedback: A painful noise? Or music to your ears?

A couple of years ago, I did a presentation under this title. It was all about the similarities I’d spoted between two apparently completely different kinds of feedback – the horrible, high-pitched whistling noise you get in a studio, or with a PA system, when the mic is too close to a speaker or a pair of headphones and the sound circles around between the two, and negative comments from customers.

I hadn’t thought of it in ages – until yesterday.

I’m currently adapting a series of training courses I normally deliver personally, into downloadable packages. If you’ve never done that, it isn’t as easy as it looks. When I’m face to face with a client or group of clients, although I follow the same basic process each time, their questions and feedback play a significant role in deciding what we focus on and how I deliver the information.. The online version has to include everything and be user-friendly for everyone who wants to use it.

As I’m too close to the subject and the material to judge whether I’m hitting either of those objectives, I’ve asked a small group of people to road-test the course as I develop it. Yesterday saw the first major milestone, when I sent them the first draft of the first module.

To be honest, I was quite surprised how nervous I was – it was almost as bad as when I hit the ‘Send’ button and emailed out the very first draft of the book!

A few hours later, I was sitting in the radio studio, interviewing Caroline Thomas of Sales Scene and Louise Innes of Dotty Hippo Design, about the Thurrock Network Group and their ‘Thurrock’s Den’ project at this weekend’s T-Fest. If you’re in the area, go and check out their stand – there’s a great prize on offer for the best videoed business pitch, courtesy of the Park Inn Thurrock, Sales Scene and Dotty Hippo Design.

The interview went really well – both girls know their stuff inside out and are passionate about their subject – but through the whole thing, I could hear the familiar high howl of feedback in my headphones – OUCH! There was nothing obviously wrong and as we were live on air, there wasn’t much I could do by way of investigation – so I just had to grin and bear it – and solve it at the earliest opportunity (before the poor listener ran as far from the radio as possible, holding their ears!)

So what’s the connection between those two events? Well, as I said at the beginning, audio feedback happens when a mic gets too close to an output source. It’s a nasty noise – it can actually hurt if it’s loud enough – but it does alert you pretty quickly to the fact that there’s a problem which will, if it’s left unchecked, drive listeners away. It’s usually quite easily fixed, by putting distance between the two bits of kit which are annoying each other.

In business, we often fight shy of getting too close to our customers, in case we hear something that hurts, don’t we? I’m twitching at the moment, waiting for my test-drivers to come back to me. I’d love them to tell me my first efforts are wonderful and I should just keep doing what I’m doing – but realistically, I know they’re far more likely to offer constructive criticism. Some of it might even sting a bit – but at least it’ll tell me where the issues are at this early stage and I’ll be able to fix them before the product hits the market – and prospective paying customers vote with their hard-earned!

We tend to see complaints etc as problems – but shouldn’t we actually see them as opportunities to improve? Rather than being painful noises (avoided by putting a distance between us and the critic), shouldn’t they be music to our ears? I’m certainly trying to see them that way at the moment!

July 20, 2011

Extreme multi-tasking – the technology bytes back

Have you ever looked at your schedule for the day and thought: ‘The only way this is going to work is if I can split myself in two!’? Frequently, I’m sure.

I actually get to do that sometimes. I can be in several different places at once –on the phone to one person, while I talk to others via podcasts – while I talk to my local radio listeners, via a pre-recorded show. How many jobs let you do that?!

Although, of course, it only works if the technology decides to play the game – and you know as well as I do, chances are it’ll decide not to play just at the moment you need it most!

That’s what happened to me last Thursday – literally. In this post, I should be telling you about the interview I did last week, with Fiona Dallimore of Up Urs Betty, which should have gone out on Thursday’s programme… That’s what I should be talking about, but…

Last Thursday was always going to be hectic. I was booked to go to Dragon Jelly in Southend in the morning and I had a vital phone meeting booked for the afternoon. I don’t normally book anything on Thursday afternoons, because I prefer to go in and do the radio show live, but if I didn’t have this meeting at 2:30pm Thursday, it wouldn’t happen for at least another month – and it couldn’t wait that long. ‘No problem,’ I thought, ‘I can record the interview and send it in with Alison’ (who does the rest of the Thursday afternoon shift). That way, I could be on air and on the phone at the same time.’

All was fine – until a text on Thursday morning told me Alie was ill. I’m next in line to take over from her and would normally do it with pleasure – but this time, of course, I couldn’t. I cursed having to pass up the opportunity of a three-hour radio stint – because I love it! – but there it was. At least I could be there for my own slot, in spirit if not in person.

At that point, the station wasn’t geared up to receive my package via the web, so I had to walk in with it. Trouble was, hard as I tried, I couldn’t fit that around going to Southend. As time ticked on, it became clear I’d have to sacrifice the Jelly session if I wanted to get the show on air and make that phone meeting.

‘Never mind,’ I thought, ‘”two out of three ain’t bad”, as they say’.

Except it wasn’t – two out of three, that is. When I got to the radio station, my package wouldn’t play on any of the computers. I still don’t understand that because I’d triple-checked it beforehand – but there it was; nearly twenty minutes of silence. Now, silence may be golden in many places – but the radio isn’t one of them! Twenty seconds of ‘dead air’ is more than enough to cause mass panic in a studio! So I had no choice but to bring the file back and try to fix it. Somewhere between the PC and my little USB drive, it had been scrambled. It would still play on my PC, but part of it sounded as though it had been broken up into little bits, they’d all been thrown into the air and come down in a completely random order.

If I’d had the rest of the day, I could have sorted it – but as it was, I ran out of time. So I must say thanks to my colleague, Tyler, for stepping in for Alison in my absence – and especially for filling the gap where my own programme should have been.

Tomorrow is a completely live show, with Caroline Thomas of Sales Scene. She’s in to talk about her plans to kickstart regeneration in Thurrock (where she’s based). As she’s coming in in person, at least she won’t get scrambled at the last minute… hopefully…

If you’re in the Basildon & East Thurrock area, you can catch the programme on 97.8 FM at 3)PM. If not, you can listen live at http://www.gateway978.com– do let me know if you manage to hear it.  If you’re wondering what ‘Up Urs Betty’ is all about, you’ll find out shortly.  Listen to the Thursday show, or watch this space…

July 18, 2011

The News of the World R.I.P – Rest In Pieces

So, a British institution, which has been a part of Sunday for a hundred and sixty-eight years, is dead. I doubt it’ll be buried just yet – the post mortem will take a while.

Last Sunday saw the final edition of The News of the World and yesterday, its millions of readers would have had to find an alternative.

Now, I should say before I go any further, I haven’t read the paper in two decades – so quite frankly, I don’t miss it; but millions no doubt will. Could it have been saved? Maybe. Should it have been? Well, in my view (for what it’s worth), no.

I recently finished an audio-visual series on customer service, which included an episode on ‘Brand Brilliance – or Brand Suicide’. When this story first broke, I thought: ‘If ever there was a case of brand suicide, this is it!’ Although ‘brand execution’ is probably more accurate. Among all the pledges of support for senior executives – closely followed by the exit of said execs stage-left – closely followed by the announcement that the paper was to close and the ads taken out in other publications to apologize for the phone-hacking mess (or for being found out…?), the images that kept coming into my mind were of some dodgy paramilitary group disposing of someone who isn’t terribly important in the great scheme of things, but could pose a threat ‘to the greater good’ if left at large; or that same group, looking for mainstream acceptance, making sure that they’re seen to be taking swift and decisive action to rid the organization of ‘undesirables’. The question in both cases, of course, is: have they really tackled the problem from the roots, or just lopped off a rotten branch?

The News of the World may or may not have been a big part of your Sunday morning, but it was a shrinking element of News Corp’s operation – up against the same threats as the rest of the print media – changing consumer behaviour, falling ad revenues, shrinking market share etc. So, morality aside, it made perfect business sense to cut it loose now, for the sake of the wider organization – not least the BSkyB bid (which was still alive when the paper was killed off).

The week before last, before the execution was announced, advertisers were dropping out right, left and centre. At the time, some commentators were slightly scornful. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, of course, but I didn’t get it. As an individual, I don’t like putting money into organizations whose principles I don’t agree with – and I’m very suspicious of those who proclaim a principle, then align themselves with someone who doesn’t uphold it. Contrary to popular belief, businesspeople have moral standpoints too – and then there’s the business case. Mud sticks, as they say – and if you happen to be standing close to someone it’s being thrown at, some of it is quite likely to stick to you. Most of us don’t have the luxury of being able to dispose of a tainted brand to save something more valuable.

I’ve had to smile at some of the TV ads for the other Sunday papers this week. Call me synical, but I can’t help wondering how many of them are heaving a corporate sigh of relief and thinking: ‘PFEW! So glad it was Murdoch’s lot who got caught! While the heat’s on them, we’ve got time to tidy up here!’

The most important thing to come out of this whole sorry business for me is the reinforcement of the idea that however wealthy, successful and powerful an individual or corporation may be, actions have consequences. Cash and influence might talk – sometimes they shout – but there are some things they can’t drown out.

June 28, 2011

More Jelly Please!

Tomorrow, social media specialist, Caroline Thomas of Sales Scene, serves up a second helping of Thurrock Jelly – the free event which gives entrepreneurs who spend a lot of their time running their businesses alone, the chance to get together and work in a more social environment.

I got off to a wobbly start for the first session, in May, leaving home without my phone or laptop (I blame the fact that my head was full of prep for the afternoon’s radio show!). This time, though, I’ve got meetings arranged and plenty of work to do in between – although I’m more than happy to break off from that to chat to new people.

If you fancy checking out this way of working, you can still book - and if you don’t book today but find yourself in the vicinity of the Park Inn, Thurrock, between 10AM and 3PM tomorrow, why not drop in? If you do, come and talk to me. You can’t miss me – I’m the one with the large black Labrador at her feet. Merlin (if you don’t know him) is a guide dog-turned-local radio star and a highly experienced networker.

June 24, 2011

How’s your Twittiquette?

If you’re on Twitter, how are your manners? Yes, I’m serious.

I started tweeting nearly two years ago, after resisting the idea for months! I really couldn’t see the point of it. Who would I be talking to? – and what could I say in so few characters that could possibly help me or anyone else?

For the first year or so, I just put out sporadic tweets about what was happening with the business, with no real response. Even when I got responses, I often missed them because I was tweeting via the website and they got lost in my time line. So I felt I was talking to myself.

Then I discovered a desktop app that allowed me to see instantly when I’d been mentioned orsent a direct message – and everything began to change. Now I happily chat with people I know – and sometimes complete strangers. I’ve made some great contacts I would never otherwise have made.

More recently, though, I’ve encountered another problem. We can only ever get 7% of our message across in print and in this odd little forum, where we have a max of 140 characters to form a personality picture of someone, it’s a real challenge not to put a ffoot in it!

I’ll give you an example: A couple of weeks ago, someone I’m following and who is following me, but whom I don’t know, put a tweet up which caught my attention. It wasn’t business. It was just a little personal observation. It made the person who tweeted it look friendly – as though he was saying, ‘Hey, come and talk to me!’ – so I did. We swapped a couple of light-hearted tweets, which obviously caught the imagination of a few more of his followers and a group chat ensued. He dropped out, but the rest of us went on tagging him in our tweets. I thought that was the right thing to do, so that he could see what was being said about him; but later, he tweeted, ‘Thanks for the chat guys – but not on my time line please’. OOPS…! I’d been so sure that if you mention someone, you should always tag them, so that they can see it. Was I missing some subtle point of Twittiquette?

Then there’s the opposite problem – people who don’t reply when they should – GRRRRRR!!! To me, it’s very simple. When I log on, I always look after the people who have mentioned or DM’ed me first, because they’re the ones who have taken the time and trouble to acknowledge me. They’re the people who are interested enough in my tweets to give a little of their valuable time to respond, or to help promote me. The very least I can do in return is to say ‘thanks’. It takes a moment to type and costs nothing, but it means a lot – and my mention helps promote them a little. If we were in a face-to-face situation and they spoke to me, or promoted me to someone else (which is basically what most retweets are), I’d acknowledge them – of course I would! – so why wouldn’t I do it on Twitter?

Still, some people don’t. I have one friend who drives me up the wall on this point (names – and all other identifying information, withheld to protect the guilty!). In person, he wouldn’t dream of ignoring someone who spoke directly to him, or not thanking someone who did something to help him out in any way; but on Twitter, it’s a very different story. He does answer some people sometimes, but others (often those who do most to raise his Twitter profile) regularly drop under the radar. Now, I don’t know whether it’s a technical issue – whether, like me in my first year, he’s missing a lot of mentions etc – or if he just doesn’t pick up on when he needs to answer. What I do know is that it isn’t deliberate rudeness. Those of us who know him well laugh it off and make excuses – but for a stranger, it would create completely the wrong impression – which could cost him opportunities, apart from anything else.

There does seem to be a general feeling that it’s ok not to be polite online, because it’s all a bit anonymous, but that begs the question: why are we there? If it isn’t to enhance existing relationships and make new connections, why do we spend time on it – time which most of us could find several other uses for?

I’m spending a lot of time on it today – the whole day in fact – with Caroline Thomas at Sales Scene, learning to improve my own social media skills and strategies. Looking forward to it – maybe she’ll show me how to deal with awkward ‘Twits’!

June 21, 2011

The times they are a-changing… or are they?

So, here we are on the longest day of the year, the official beginning of Summer – not that you’d notice – and as predictably as the date itself, the annual debate about whether or not we should be on the same time as continental Europe has rolled around again.

The Day Light Saving Bill is currently making its way through parliament. If it goes through, our clocks will still ‘Spring forward’ and ‘Fall back’ – they’ll just do it an hour later.

On the face of it, it’s hard to believe one hour could make that much difference to anyone – but this whole subject arouses some very strong feelings on both sides of the argument. Those in favour say it would be great for business, giving us extra day light after work, when we’re far more likely to use it, while those against point to the fact that it would mean that children in the north of England and in Scotland would have to go to school in the dark. In parts of Scotland in the winter, if the clocks were an hour ahead of where they are now, the sun wouldn’t rise until about 10AM. A few months ago, I saw a documentary on this, in which I felt the pro-change lobby did themselves no favours at all, because their whole argument seemed to revolve around the benefits to one business sector.

That said, I can see merit in both arguments. Extra light in the evenings would (as the documentary suggested) be great for the leisure and tourism industry – and anyone with the time and cash to enjoy it; but one of the pay-offs would be that a number of kids who would otherwise be able to get themselves to school would have to be escorted, putting extra pressure on working parents.

Then there are those of us who don’t work 9-to-5. I’m writing this at 6:30AM. Ok, so I haven’t had to commute to my desk, but if I had, it would have been much easier and more pleasant with a bit of light on the subject! I’ve done plenty of early breakfast meetings in my time and I’ve always found it a lot harder to motivate myself on dark mornings. Yes, I know that having the light at the beginning of the day means that, as the year wears on, I’ll lose it at the end – but for me personally, I have to say it’s more important to my productivity to wake up in the light. I’m naturally an early bird. I do my best work before lunch – especially at this time of year, when the sun is up (even if it’s obscured by cloud) before my alarm goes off.

What about you? Are you an early bird or a night owl – and does that affect whether you support the bill or not? Is the fact that the UK is on a different time zone to the rest of Europe an outmoded obstacle to continental commerce? Or is it justified because it serves a genuine purpose?

Let me know what you think.
Leave me a comment here,
Tweet me, or
Email me.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Hosted by Killer SEO SuperBlogs