Sherie Griffiths

January 28, 2011

Andy gets the boot & Richard walks off the field!

So, after that unfortunate incident on Sky Sports last weekend, Andy Gray was fired on Tuesday and the next day, his colleague, Richard Keys, resigned.

In a radio interview, Keys referred cryptically to “dark forces” being at work at Sky. Well, that could be true if Mr Murdoch gets his hands on the 61% of the company he doesn’t already own – but that’s another story, for another blog!

As to this story, as I said on Monday, I see a lot of positives in the fact that the FA and Sky were both quick to react to Gray and Keys’ comments about assistant Ref, Sian Massey – but I find certain aspects of the whole thing a bit uncomfortable.

I’ve seen and heard a lot of discussions this week, with a woman on one side and a white man on the other (his colour is relevant here). When the man has tried to say he can’t see what all the fuss is about, the woman has, quite rightly, come back and said,
“That’s because you’re highly unlikely to experience discrimination in your career”.

It’s very difficult, if not impossible, to appreciate the demoralising effect of constantly being defined by just one dimension of who you are, if you’ve never experienced it.

Well (again, as I said on Monday) I’ve seen it firsthand – discrimination on the grounds of my eye-sight seriously got in the way of my progress up the legal career ladder in the early days. Pre-DDA, I was openly told by one employer that
“You can stay here as long as you like, provided you don’t expect to progress beyond the typewriter – we couldn’t take that risk”.
As a young woman in the law, I was once told (by a middle-aged, white Solicitor I dared to argue with),
“Go away, dear, have a cream cake and calm down – there’s a good girl!” Yes – really! One of the most satisfying days of my nineteen-year legal career was the day I got the result I wanted for my client in that particular case!

I don’t like discrimination in any form – but one thing I realised when I worked with the Disability Discrimination Act is that it is a fact of life, whether we like it or not. Human beings will always judge each other on the most obvious aspects of who we are – including race, gender and disability. That might not be a particularly palatable idea for a lot of us in the 21st century, but it’s true. When I trained employers in how to work with the DDA, I used to start by acknowledging this – then point out that the way to deal with it is to:
“be honest with yourself about your own prejudices – because then you can make a conscious effort to put them to one side and not let them drive your decision-making processes”.

You can’t legislate for attitudes – never could, never will. Changing ingrained views which are learnt from the cradle, and so changing cultures, takes time and education.

Sky and the FA have been very clear about the culture they’re trying to create – and good on both of them for that!; but two things make me uncomfortable about the issue of Gray and Keys:

1 – the fact remains that their comments were off-air – it was effectively a private conversation. They expressed outdated, ill-informed views in an unpleasant way, but they didn’t intend what they said to be for public consumption and their views won’t (or shouldn’t) impact on Ms Massey’s career prospects. It wasn’t the first offence – but to my knowledge, previous cock-ups didn’t make the national news. Why did this grab the attention particularly? Is there anything in the timing of it, I wonder?

2 – why did the FA remove Sian Massey from her next scheduled match? Surely their support of her and other female officials should have extended to letting her get on with her job? One argument could be that they were trying to protect her from a lot of media attention and/or abuse from the terraces – but personally, I think protection is a dangerous route to take. She’d done nothing wrong, so why was she not allowed to carry on as normal? The risk of too much protection of someone who’s open to discrimination is that it sometimes happens, unwittingly, at the expense of respect – respect, in this case, of this woman as a professional in her chosen field (no pun intended!).

What I don’t know – and if you do, I’d love to hear from you – is whether Sian Massey herself asked not to officiate at that next match?

March 2, 2010

“On Sound Foundations” – The Story Of A Book

Just before Christmas, a colleague said to me, “I bet you’ll be glad to see the back of this year, won’t you?” I knew what she meant – 2009 had been tough for most of us in business and I’d had some major personal challenges thrown in. Yet I hesitated over my answer. Yes, there were moments I’d rather not remember and definitely wouldn’t want to relive, but for all that, it had been an incredibly productive year for me. I’m not talking financially, but in terms of focus. In August, in the middle of a family issue which very nearly led me to throw in the towel in business, I finally broke down a personal barrier which had held me back in every area of my life – very liberating! Then in November, sixteen months on from opening and six months after the official launch, I finally worked out what my business was all about. “Wasn’t that a bit late?” I hear you ask – and you’ve got a point. Better late than never though!

At 5.00am on 6th November 2009, after yet another sleepless night, wondering why I seemed to be working my socks – and various bits of my anatomy – off just to stand still, I stood in my kitchen, coffee pot in hand and it hit me – no, not the coffee pot – the revelation! THE ANSWER! “EUREKA!” The lights went on and I saw it all – where I’d been going wrong, how to put it right – and more!

“So that’s my core skill! I thought, amazed – “I know how sound works!” Here I was, more than a year and a half after my decision to make the leap – and leap it certainly was – from law into business podcasting, finally realising that I know how sound works. Yes, I am a bit slow – especially at five in the morning!

The truth is, I knew how sound worked, how people used it and what it could do if they used it properly long before that moment – I just didn’t know that I knew. As I poured that much needed first cup of coffee, pieces of a jigsaw which had been floating around my head for nearly two years, never quite forming a picture, suddenly clicked into place and I saw the image clearly – the image of my business, how it came to be and where it could go. I spent the next several weeks redesigning services to fit that picture.

Before 6th November, the most positive response I had to my marketing efforts tended to be, “I’m really interested in what you do, but I don’t get it.” Now it’s, “I’m really interested in what you do – when can we talk?” Like most of the changes I made to our offering, it’s a small shift on the face of it – with a huge impact.

Nineteen years ago, someone said, “You should write a book” – but I was only twenty-three then and probably knew even less about life than I did about writing. So although I gave it a go, it didn’t happen. In November last year, I was planning a series of books about starting and running a business; but after that 5.00am “EUREKA!” moment, they were pushed aside by something else which insisted on being written “NOW!!!” From a pure business perspective, the timing was all wrong. I should have waited until we were truly out of recession, until the company was more established. In fact, I probably should have waited until I retired, but this book would brook no argument – the words fell out faster than I could type! The baby was coming, whether I or anyone around me liked it or not!

It started life as a practical guide to business podcasting, against a background of my experience as a lifelong media junky and obsessive communicator; but it evolved into the story of my forty-year apprenticeship in sound – the foundations on which my company and everything we now do is built. It also tells the very personal story of my development of the “womble” principle – of which, more later.

I finished the book last Thursday evening. Over the next couple of months, as I prepare for publication, I’m going to tell you a bit about how it came together and some of the things I learnt from writing it – because I did learn. Two people, both dear friends and close colleagues, have been slightly less than fulsome in their support for the project. I think that’s mainly because they’re applying cost/benefit analysis principles, looking at the amount of time this kind of undertaking demands, against the likely financial return. On that basis, I’ve just “wasted” three and a half months of evenings and weekends – but I know I haven’t. Even if no-one else ever reads the finished product, it was worth writing because it helped me work out what I’m about, how I got here and where I’m going.

Hosted by Killer SEO SuperBlogs