Sherie Griffiths

August 4, 2010

Get PodSavvy – ‘Sound Advice’

Last week, we released the second episode of our monthly business communications podcast, ‘Get PodSavvy’ –. This month’s theme is ‘Where do I start?’ So of course that was the question I looked at in the first episode of my ‘Sound Advice’ feature (which will appear within each monthly show). The series gives me the chance to share some tips and tricks on the subject of professional business audio.

The answer to the question is, of course, ‘with research’. If you have no experience of this kind of project, the starting point for that research is listening – soaking up as much of other people’s content as you can get your ears on! Dr Stephen Covey says that out of reading, writing, speaking and listening, listening is the activity we spend the highest percentage of our time doing (or at least attempting to do) but the lowest percentage of our time learning. I’d go along with that – although I have to say, in my professional experience, the average person’s listening skills are better than they think. I’m consistently surprised by clients who swear they’re ‘no good at listening’, then proceed to spot a flawed piece of audio on first hearing. They can’t always tell me straight off what’s wrong with it – but they know it isn’t right; it isn’t ‘comfortable’ to listen to.

I set you a challenge in the programme – to turn away from the tv for a few minutes, just listen, and see what you pick up on. I try this with all my training clients –with some really interesting results. If you give it a go, do let me know what happens.

The July show is the first I’ve recorded in USP’s new studios – which include some very swish television facilities. So I had to be a bit careful what I said about tv sound – although I still had to tell it like it is – traditionally, it’s been ‘the poor relation’, the assumption being that the viewer will be so preoccupied with the pictures, the sound really doesn’t matter. Even I assumed that was the case for a lot of people – until recently, when I was talking to someone who makes videos for business and he commented that the standard of the audio behind the pictures could make or break the whole presentation.

For this month’s competition, I’m asking you to identify what’s wrong with a sound clip. Obviously, you need to listen to be able to have a crack at it.

The winner of the June competition was Tim Carter of Attwaters Solicitors in Harlow, Essex. He was the only person correctly to identify that Ivan Newman was reciting ‘Jabberwocky’ by Lewis Carroll. The stakes have gone up this month – not only do you get an hour of me for free, you also get an hour with Ivan. Between us, we can help you improve your customer service – and sound professional when you shout about it!

Talking of the relationship between sound and pictures (as I was just now), next week, I’ll tell you a bit about the first ‘Get PodSavvy’ feature to go visual.

April 16, 2010

The big Debate –Did You Get The Message?

Well, did you watch?; and if so, what did you make of it? Did you feel you got an insight into the personalities behind the parties, or did it feel more like a marathon joint press conference?

I felt I was proved right about the audience being a prop. I’m not sure what was added by members of the public, some of them terribly nervous, reading out their questions and then not being able to respond to the answers they were given – and in some cases, the answers they weren’t given. I know what was intended with the use of that device – they were there to represent you and me. I’m just not sure if it worked.

Not surprisingly, there were times when the responses were distinctly ‘Political’ – in the sense of politicians trying to answer the questions they wished they’d been asked, rather than the ones they were actually asked; and I did hear some evidence of careful line-learning – especially when phrases were recited over and over. Repetition works in marketing – we all know that; but it can get pretty tedious if we hear the same soundbites in the same order again and again within a few minutes!

I also have to agree with everyone I’ve heard across the media this morning, who’ve said the show was too long. In marketing terms, we’re always being reminded that people today have a shorter attention span than they used to. I regularly find myself trying to squeeze 60 minutesworth of information into less than 30 for that reason. Ok, half an hour would have gone nowhere last night, but I think an hour would have been plenty.

I couldn’t help noticing that they were all extremely busy meeting ‘ordinary’ people ‘the other day’. I don’t know which day it was – but they must have been completely knackered by the end of it! It got to a point where, like a twitch, or (something I’m very familiar with in sound production) an ‘erm’ pattern, I started to see an ‘I was talking to’ pattern –and it threatened to distract me from what they were talking about! It was obviously intended to show they were all in touch with ‘real people’, but it was a bit overdone. It reminded me of non-media people who go through media training. They’re often taught that when being interviewed on radio or tv, they should ’use the presenter’s name’. Unfortunately, some take it to the cringe-making enth degree, throwing in the name at every opportunity – and sometimes even when there isn’t an opportunity – “Well, John, as I was saying, John ..” etc etc.

There were positives, though – despite the 40-page rule book governing the event. I thought some of the most telling moments came when the moderator, Alastair Stewart, had to battle to retain control – when the combatants threatened to break out into a real row! Also, even the diving around the issues I mentioned earlier told me something about these individuals. Whether it told me what they wanted me to hear, I don’t know; but that’s the constant challenge with marketing, isn’t it – making sure that the message we want the customer to hear is the one they actually receive? So often, messages are lost in translation, aren’t they?

I’m always telling clients to talk ‘to’ their market, rather than at it. If I’m honest, for much of last night’s programme, I felt I was being talked ‘at’. I had a mad idea earlier this morning – get each one of the candidates into a radio studio on their own, with no audience in front of them to play to and no opponent to compete with. I’m not talking about an interview here. I’m talking about turning them into temporary presenters – so that they have to talk to each of us on a one-to-one basis. If we let them loose with the format, what sort of show would each come up with, I wonder …

No, of course I’m not serious – but if they mean what they say about wanting to connect with us personally, it could be a fun way of doing it – fun for us, if not for them!

Hosted by Killer SEO SuperBlogs