Sherie Griffiths

April 29, 2010

SHHH! Mic’s Have Ears!

There was a serious issue behind yesterday’s news about Gordon Brown’s gaff, but I have a confession: my first response was to laugh!  I’ll tell you why in a minute. 

First, in case  you missed the Prime Minister’s unscheduled Party Election broadcast (if so, where have you been? – it’s been everywhere!), it came out of one of those chance encounters with voters of which all three party leaders seemed to have had so many ‘the other day’, before the first TV debate.  This time, Mr Brown had an apparently friendly chat with a lady who described herself as a lifelong Labour supporter.  When she challenged him on issues ranging from pensions to the national debt, he seemed to do his utmost to answer her questions and they seemed to part on quite amicable terms. 

Once back in his car, though, Gordon expressed his true feelings.  He growled that he “should never have been put with that woman” and called her a ‘bigot’ – because of her comments on immigration.  The trouble was that he’d forgotten he was still wearing a radio mic, which relayed everything he said straight to the three main broadcasters (Sky, ITV and the BBC) and so to the lady herself. 

Of course the Prime Minister immediately apologised – ‘profusely’, as the Chancellor, Alastair Darling, described it.  Perhaps not too surprisingly, the target of his spleen wasn’t impressed.  For what it’s worth, I think his apologies were genuine.  I’m sure he was truly sorry – for being overheard.

The coverage immediately after the event implied that we should be shocked that a politician could show one face in public and another in private – and maybe we should, but I’m not.  Call me cynical, but I accept that politics inevitably involves saying the right things at the right time – like marketing.  After all, that’s what electioneering is, isn’t it?  Each party is currently marketing its socks off, trying to win you and me as new or repeat customers. 

In case you’re wondering, when I say marketing is about saying the right things at the right time, I’m talking about finding out what the customer wants and finding a way to supply that want.  I’m certainly not advocating telling them what you think they want to hear, then going on your own sweet way.  Playing that game is bound to land you in the brown stuff eventually, isn’t it?  Marketing should never be about saying one thing in public and believing another in private – and if you’re in the marketing frontline (as the party leaders are)  but can’t deal with customer feedback, you’re in trouble.  

What did shock me when I first heard this story was that someone who has presumably had considerable media training – and experience – over the years, should make a mistake like this.  Then I thought again, remembered Tony Blackburn and the ‘Sky Channel incident’ – and burst out laughing!

In 1985, TB was part of the new team presenting music programmes on the still very new Sky Channel.  In March of that year, a story appeared in the paper about an unfortunate incident involving Tony, a radio mic and a ‘comfort break’.  Apparently, during the ads in the middle of a live show, he headed for the little boys’ room, did what little boys must do, washed his hands, came back to the studio, whistling all the way – and Europe heard it all, thanks to the radio mic on his lapel, which was still live.  OOOOOPS!

I guess if a seasoned broadcaster like Tony Blackburn can forget he’s wired for sound, Gordon Brown can be forgiven for doing the same.

Less excusable by his party colleagues, I suspect, is what this implies about their leader’s trustworthiness in the eyes of voters.  The last thing any of the participants in this election need right now is such stark evidence that ‘politicians say one thing and mean another’. 

The Labour Party will defend Gordon to the hilt in public, naturally, but I wonder what they’re saying in private … wouldn’t you like to be a mic on that walll …?

March 8, 2010

The Advertising Industry Is Apparently Getting ‘Less Worse’

This story was carried on Friday morning’s BBC business news, although actually, the quote and the figures which prompted it have been around for a while.  It comes from Sir Martin Sorrell, CEO of global advertising agency WPP, which is the parent company of a number of other ad agencies.  The company’s profits are rising again, after the ‘most worst’ (my words) advertising recession ever seen.  Interestingly, within WPP, online marketing seems to have put in the ‘least weakest’ (again, my words) performance.

Earlier in the week, we had the latest figures from ITV, showing a 2.7 billion pound loss in 2008 converted into a profit of 25 million in 2009 – significantly less worse!  Traditional advertising revenues were on the slide before the recession bit and the improvement (or should that be ‘negative deterioration’?) is due at least in part to changes in the kind of advertising offered – specifically, the increase in ‘spot’ ads – directly attached to programmes.  These are supposed to catch the viewer who has drifted away during the ad break – or whizzed through the ads while watching via Sky+ or similar.  Then there are whole segments of viewing sponsored by one advertiser – so their ad pops up at the beginning and end of every part of every show in that segment. 

It’s quite comforting, in a way, isn’t it, to know that even a massive global industry like advertising has to move with the times, to adapt to changing technologies by coming up with innovative ways of reaching their target market?

As for the negative dressed as a positive – or is it the other way around? – I find that less comforting.  In fact, I find it quite disconcerting.  As we climb out of recession, whatever industry we’re in, if we’re scared to look forward with confidence – and to admit that’s what we’re doing – aren’t we in danger of missing the next opportunity?  Any thoughts?

Hosted by Killer SEO SuperBlogs